The Foundation Trilogy
CRITIQUE | QUOTES
First editionOriginal trilogy:
• Foundation, 1951
• Foundation and Empire, 1952
• Second Foundation, 1953
Later sequels:
• Foundation Edge, 1982
• Foundation and Earth, 1986
Later prequels:
• Prelude to Foundation, 1988
• Forward the Foundation, 1993
First publication
Published as stories in Astounding Science Fiction magazine
First book publication
1951 (Foundation)
Literature form
Novels
Genres
Science fiction
Writing language
English
Author's country
United States
Length
Foundation approx 70,500 words, trilogy approx. 220,000 words
Galactic puzzles within puzzles
In the 1980s Isaac Asimov reread the Foundation stories he had written in the 1940s and had compiled as a trilogy of books in the 1950s, and he was appalled. The stories had no action, no suspense, no romance—they were all thought and dialogue. And yet he found them involving. Even though he was the author, he wanted to read more.
So he says in an introduction that appears in later editions of the books. He may also be describing the reaction of many readers. These are very talky, ruminative stories.
There is big action: a galactic empire starts to crumble, psychohistorian Hari Seldon secretly establishes a repository of science and knowledge in a foundation at the edge of the galaxy to speed humankind's recovery from the coming dark ages, local warlords fight for power, the foundation's existence is threatened, charismatic figures seize power.... All kinds of action occurs on a large scale. But it isn't at the centre of the books.
On centre stage is a huge mystery being unravelled: the quest for the second foundation that Seldon posthumously reveals he had set up at the opposite end of the galaxy. What Seldon meant by the "opposite end" is not so easy to determine. Each of the books in the original Foundation Trilogy (that is, Foundation, Foundation and Empire, and Second Foundation) solves the evolving mystery in a way that trumps the previous book.
Actually there are more than three puzzles worked out. The trilogy was made from eight stories, plus an introduction Asimov wrote to detail the first three hundred years of the Foundation saga. (This is what writers call a fixup, turning linked stories into novels.) So in each book of the trilogy you get two to five chunks of the mystery, often presenting lines of thought that appear confirmed and then discarding them as new solutions to the Seldon mystery are worked out in history.
Somehow it is all quite a thrilling and mentally stimulating ride. A page turner. Small wonder the trilogy was awarded the Hugo award for best series of all time in 1966, beating out Lord of the Rings.
Expanding the universe
Each of the books added to the series after the trilogy is also involving in its way, but successively less so. Foundation's Edge, written four decades after the first Foundation story, took the saga to another level. Foundation and Earth finds the ultimate solution but suffers from Asimov trying to fit it in with the other science fiction worlds he had created.
The last two Foundation books, Prelude to Foundation and Forward the Foundation, are prequels, outlining Hari Seldon's struggle to launch his Foundation project. To be chronologically correct, it may seem sensible to begin reading the series with these—but don't! These are the worst written and, without the foundational mystery to solve, the most boring of the lot. They reek of an author creating a memorial.
My advice—similar to that I give for Philip José Farmer's great Riverworld series or Frank Herbert's ever-growing Dune universe—is to start reading the books in the order they were written and read as far into the series as you enjoy. You may be satisfied with the trilogy. Or you may, like most readers, feel the need to race through to the final answer of the fifth book. Or you may become so hooked by the world Asimov created that you'll take even third-rate Foundation in the form of the two prequels.
You might even enjoy some stories by other science-fiction writers set in the Foundation universe. Orson Scott Card wrote "The Originist" about the founding of the second foundation, which is collected in an anthology tribute to Asimov.
There are no earth-shaking ideas in the Foundation books. Nothing that greatly moves or inspires me as I go about my daily existence. Not consciously, at least.
But, for some reason, I've read the original trilogy at least twice (and the rest of the series at least once), and one of the pleasures I have to look forward to, if I live long enough, is to get lost in the Foundation saga again.
— Eric
CRITIQUE | QUOTES
